I’ve been told that my last blog regarding the importance of wall thickness when utilizing external industrial vibrators for bins or hoppers seems to have struck a chord. I plan to expand on that blog by providing some recommendations for sizing external vibrators since I merely referred to a vibrator with proper force previously – and you just may have been afraid to ask!
Essentially, we need to apply enough external force to the wall of the bin or hopper to assist gravity in getting material to flow. While I previously stressed properly flexing of the wall to get the material to flow, we still need to determine the correct amount of force to apply based on the configuration of the hopper as well as the bulk density and flowability of the material. Since we are able to produce our own fabricated equipment based on our expert experience through the years, we know that these variables are crucial to proper use of industrial vibration applications.
Our first task is to determine the weight of the material in the sloped wall (cone) section. Unless this is provided, we need to calculate the volume of the cone. The following is a link to our sizing guide which provides formulas on page 2 for calculating the volume of square/rectangular hoppers and circular hoppers: http://www.clevelandvibrator.com/images/Documents/CVCsizingguide_11092012.pdf
Once we know the volume, make sure it’s in, or convert it to cubic feet, and then simply multiply it by the bulk density of the material which needs to be in pounds/cubic feet to give you the pounds of material in the cone. Most vibrator companies offer charts where they recommend specific vibrators based on the material in the cone. You can once again refer to our sizing guide above for our recommendations. For those with inquiring minds, our charts are based on a ratio of 1.0 pound of force for every 10 pounds of material in the cone. You should consider multiple vibrators where you need to limit the size of the vibrator due to the wall thickness or the physical size of the hopper dictates it.
Now for the fun part, which vibrator type should you select? I am proponent of linear vibration for typical hopper applications. Most folks are aware that hammers are used to help promote flow in hoppers. While they can work, it leaves you open for medical issues and can lead to damage to the hopper. Air piston vibrators provide linear vibration with styles that impact, somewhat replicating a hammer hit, but at much higher frequencies. I recommend Cleveland Vibrator Co.’s Single Impact Air Knocker Vibrators where an air powered piston impacts one stroke at a time for poor flowing materials. This style operates in a cycle, most commonly in conjunction with a timer so that the piston impacts, returns and is held until it receives a signal for the next impact. I then suggest the more common impact vibrators if the material flows more freely. This style has the piston impacting continuously at a high frequency when activated and can be very effective. When noise is a consideration, a third style of air piston vibrator, Cleveland Vibrator’s VMSAC or VMRAC vibrators can be utilized. These Industrial Vibrators are air-cushioned, where the piston does not impact, resulting in lower noise volumes. These run quieter since there is no metal to metal impacting, but consequently they are less powerful, so you typically need a larger piston than those in a similarly sized impact vibrator, for the same application.
When linear vibration is not necessary or desired, Cleveland Vibrator has other options available such as Pneumatic Ball Vibrators, our Turbomite Series containing pneumatic turbine vibrators, and lastly our “rotary” air powered vibrators. These vibrators produce centrifugal force by rotating an eccentric weight. They typically provide a very high frequency. Only the turbine vibrator in this group has more acceptable noise levels. I generally suggest these style vibrators for smaller hoppers where the material is very free flowing.
When air is not available or desirable, our Rotary Electric Industrial Vibrators can be utilized. Electromagnetic vibrators produce linear force at a high frequency, so I usually reserve them for small, thinner walled hoppers. Rotary electric vibrators produce a centrifugal force, but I believe they are better suited for hopper applications where the material flow is good. These vibrators produce the least amount of noise and are available in several voltages. They are also available with different frequencies. The higher frequencies like 3600 RPM are best for heavier density materials like sand while a lower frequency like 1800 RPM might be better suited for light densities as they produce a greater stroke. None of these vibrators, with the possible exception of the single impactors, should ever be run continuously for any great length of time. The reason is that if the flow of material is ever impeded, the external vibration could actually worsen the condition by packing the material more tightly in the cone.
So you no longer need to ask. You now have some ideas on which vibrators to consider and the amount of force you will need to apply. Don’t forget that you still need to flex the wall to promote material flow and follow good welding practices combined with proper wall thickness recommendations to prevent cracking.
Still have more questions? We are here to help! Simply click here for more information.
Latest posts by Jack Steinbuch (see all)
- Can You Operate 460/3/60 Industrial Electric Vibrators at 380/3/50? - June 5, 2017
- Let’s Clear the Air on Vibratory Drives for Hazardous Locations - September 20, 2016
- It’s Complicated, or Is It? The Frequency, Stroke & Acceleration Relationship - November 30, 2015
- What You Need To Know About Screening Media – Part V - July 13, 2015
- What You Need To Know About Screening Media – Part IV - May 7, 2015