It’s Complicated, or Is It? The Frequency, Stroke & Acceleration Relationship

Jack Steinbuch

Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) have become commonplace in many of our bulk material handling applications due to the adjustability they provide and the cost which has become more attractive over the years.  However, I have found that many of our customers do not understand what they can achieve with this controller and how it affects acceleration when working with our electromechanically driven equipment featuring twin electric motor vibrators like our EMF vibratory feeders, EMS vibratory screeners and FA flat deck & GT grid top tables.

So we will start off with the fact that is contrary to what some might think – the lowering of the frequency does not affect the stroke being produced by the equipment.  The stroke of the equipment can only be changed by mechanically adjusting the eccentric weight settings on the vibrators.  Frequency adjustment affects the force output and subsequently the g’s of acceleration.  The acceleration is a function of the total set force (SF) output of the vibrators divided by the vibrating weight (W) which is the sum of the weight of the vibrating body mounted on isolators + weight of the vibrators + material load.

So now you may ask yourself, can we determine the force output and ultimately the g’s when reducing the frequency from the full rated speed of the vibrating motors to a specific lower frequency?  The answer is yes.  The reduced force output can easily be calculated by using the following formula where CF is the centrifugal force you are trying to calculate, SF is the known force output the vibrator is set at and Hz is the cycles/second that you read out on a VFD display where 60 Hz is the full rated speed of the vibrator.

CF = SF x (Hz/60)2

For example, if SF = 1,000 lbs Force and you reduce the speed from 60 down to 48 Hz:

  1. CF = 1000 x (48/60)2
  2. = 1000 x (0.8)2
  3. = 1000 x 0.64
  4. CF = 640 lbs Force

Taking the example further to calculate the difference in g’s if the vibrating weight is 250 lbs:

  1. → g’s= SF/W
  2. With SF = 1,000 lbs Force
  3. = 1000/250
  4. = 4.0 g’s @ 60 Hz

vs. CF/W

  1. = 640/250
  2. = 2.56 g’s @ 48 Hz

In summary, reducing the frequency from 60 Hz down to 48 Hz reduced the force output of the vibrator(s) from 1,000 to 640 lbs Force and the acceleration from 4.0 to 2.56 g’s.

You now have the tools to figure out the full capability of your vibrating equipment when utilizing a VFD.  Now if only the Cleveland Browns could just get the right tools i.e. management, players…  At least the Cavaliers appear to be the real deal, so all is not lost!

Still need some help figuring out this equation, myself and my team are here to help!

The following two tabs change content below.
Jack Steinbuch

Jack Steinbuch

Equipment Sales Engineer at Cleveland Vibrator Co.
Jack Steinbuch has been associated with Cleveland Vibrator for 27 years in several sales and managerial capacities. He began working in the material handling industry as an application engineer for a vibrating screen manufacturer after receiving his degree in Civil Engineering. This lead to acquiring considerable expertise in sizing screening equipment and gaining a broad knowledge of numerous types of screening media. Early years at Cleveland Vibrator led to learning and applying their full line of industrial vibrators to specific customer applications. He then settled into the Fabricated Equipment line of the company, adding to his prior screening knowledge by becoming proficient in sizing and quoting vibratory feeders and tables. His experience in a wide variety of industries has lead to broadening his knowledge of ancillary equipment which has rounded him into a more valuable consultive source who takes an analytical approach to problem solving. Although Sales is his game, customer service is crucial and he believes very strongly that it is important to provide the proper product for an application even if it happens not to be one that is supplied by Cleveland Vibrator. He loves sports; watching and playing. He is an avid golfer and a league bowler during the winter.
One Response to It’s Complicated, or Is It? The Frequency, Stroke & Acceleration Relationship
  1. Luis Fuentes Reply

    Excelent article, very good and useful information specifically for example in the cement plants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Please enter your name, email and a comment.